<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Complexity made visible: mechanical watches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.starchamber.com/2009/04/watchmaking-in-the-21st-century.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.starchamber.com/2009/04/watchmaking-in-the-21st-century.html</link>
	<description>Ned Gulley&#039;s Blog. Resident buzzwords: wise crowds, accelerated design, swarm robotics, synthetic biology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:08:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike O</title>
		<link>http://www.starchamber.com/2009/04/watchmaking-in-the-21st-century.html/comment-page-1#comment-132366</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starchamber.com/?p=1244#comment-132366</guid>
		<description>I recall once seeing a cartoon distinguishing &quot;fancy&quot; from &quot;fancy-schmancy&quot;: the Gyrotourbillon seems more the latter.  I used to have a mechanical-digital alarm clock whose mechanism was based on a roladex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall once seeing a cartoon distinguishing &#8220;fancy&#8221; from &#8220;fancy-schmancy&#8221;: the Gyrotourbillon seems more the latter.  I used to have a mechanical-digital alarm clock whose mechanism was based on a roladex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

