<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The word &#8220;virtual&#8221; is meaningless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.starchamber.com/2006/11/the-word-virtual-is-meaningless.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.starchamber.com/2006/11/the-word-virtual-is-meaningless.html</link>
	<description>Ned Gulley's Blog. Resident buzzwords: synthetic biology, ambient displays, swarm robotics, wise crowds.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Sawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.starchamber.com/2006/11/the-word-virtual-is-meaningless.html#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Sawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starchamber.com/?p=1339#comment-988</guid>
		<description>On a semi-related side note, I recently found out that the "real" world is now being referred to as "meatspace", which I find quite endearing in a Neuromancer sort of way.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a semi-related side note, I recently found out that the &#8220;real&#8221; world is now being referred to as &#8220;meatspace&#8221;, which I find quite endearing in a Neuromancer sort of way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ned</title>
		<link>http://www.starchamber.com/2006/11/the-word-virtual-is-meaningless.html#comment-987</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starchamber.com/?p=1339#comment-987</guid>
		<description>Analog (adj.): The pre-Johnny von Neumann state of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Analog (adj.): The pre-Johnny von Neumann state of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.starchamber.com/2006/11/the-word-virtual-is-meaningless.html#comment-986</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starchamber.com/?p=1339#comment-986</guid>
		<description>My personal favorite retronym:

Analog (adj.)



Discuss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My personal favorite retronym:</p>
<p>Analog (adj.)</p>
<p>Discuss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ned</title>
		<link>http://www.starchamber.com/2006/11/the-word-virtual-is-meaningless.html#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 03:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starchamber.com/?p=1339#comment-985</guid>
		<description>I've heard the term &lt;em&gt;retronym&lt;/em&gt; used for neologisms that are coined to refit old words that have since become ambiguous. In the aerospace business, the word "aircraft" used to refer uniquely to planes you see at the airport. But they had to start calling them "fixed-wing aircraft" when helicopters ("rotorcraft") came along. Sounds stupid though. "Does your aircraft have fixed wings?" I sure hope so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard the term <em>retronym</em> used for neologisms that are coined to refit old words that have since become ambiguous. In the aerospace business, the word &#8220;aircraft&#8221; used to refer uniquely to planes you see at the airport. But they had to start calling them &#8220;fixed-wing aircraft&#8221; when helicopters (&#8221;rotorcraft&#8221;) came along. Sounds stupid though. &#8220;Does your aircraft have fixed wings?&#8221; I sure hope so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.starchamber.com/2006/11/the-word-virtual-is-meaningless.html#comment-984</link>
		<dc:creator>St. Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://starchamber.com/?p=1339#comment-984</guid>
		<description>I heard an interview on NPR a while back, and the Uber Geek who was being interviewed about advances in Virtual Reality, kept referring to the real world as "real reality'....as opposed to "virtual reality".
Hey Pal, it's called REALITY.Sheesh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard an interview on NPR a while back, and the Uber Geek who was being interviewed about advances in Virtual Reality, kept referring to the real world as &#8220;real reality&#8217;&#8230;.as opposed to &#8220;virtual reality&#8221;.<br />
Hey Pal, it&#8217;s called REALITY.Sheesh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
